New York State Regents ELA Part 2 Rubric - Writing From Sources / Argument

• May 19, 2024 • 4 min read

✨ Summary: Argumentative Writing Rubric for NY Regents ELA exam. Comprehensive scoring guidelines for source-based arguments.

Table of Contents 📒

Get quality feedback on student writing with this rubric

Get quality feedback on argumentative writing with this rubric

Use the "NY Regents ELA Part 2 Argument Rubric" to strengthen your argumentative writing!

New York State Regents Argumentative Writing Rubric

Key Points

This rubric guides assessment of argumentative essays on the NY Regents ELA exam
It evaluates four main criteria: content/analysis, evidence, organization, and conventions
It uses a 1-6 scoring scale with detailed performance descriptors
It specifically focuses on argument writing using multiple sources

Full Rubric

Score	Content and Analysis	Command of Evidence	Coherence, Organization, and Style	Control of Conventions
6	- Introduce precise and insightful claim - Demonstrate in-depth analysis of texts	- Present ideas fully and thoughtfully - Use wide range of specific evidence	- Exhibit skillful organization - Use sophisticated language	- Control conventions with essentially no errors
5	- Introduce precise and thoughtful claim - Demonstrate thorough analysis	- Present ideas clearly and accurately - Use effective specific evidence	- Exhibit logical organization - Use fluent and precise language	- Control conventions with occasional errors
4	- Introduce precise claim - Demonstrate appropriate analysis	- Present ideas sufficiently - Use adequate specific evidence	- Exhibit acceptable organization - Use precise language	- Demonstrate partial control
3	- Introduce reasonable claim - Demonstrate some analysis	- Present ideas briefly - Use some relevant evidence	- Exhibit some organization - Use primarily basic language	- Demonstrate emerging control
2	- Introduce claim - Demonstrate confused analysis	- Present ideas inconsistently - Use irrelevant evidence	- Exhibit inconsistent organization - Use inappropriate language	- Demonstrate lack of control
1	- Do not introduce claim - Do not demonstrate analysis	- Present little or no evidence	- Exhibit little organization - Use incoherent language	- Are minimal

Detailed Rubric Breakdown

Content and Analysis

Score	Criteria
6	- Introduce precise and insightful claim as directed by task - Demonstrate in-depth analysis to distinguish from alternate claims
5	- Introduce precise and thoughtful claim - Demonstrate thorough analysis to distinguish from alternate claims
4	- Introduce precise claim - Demonstrate appropriate analysis to distinguish from alternate claims
3	- Introduce reasonable claim - Demonstrate some analysis but insufficiently distinguish from alternate claims
2	- Introduce claim - Demonstrate confused analysis failing to distinguish from alternate claims
1	- Do not introduce claim - Do not demonstrate analysis of texts

Command of Evidence

Score	Criteria
6	- Present ideas fully with highly effective evidence - Demonstrate proper citation of sources
5	- Present ideas clearly with effective evidence - Demonstrate proper citation
4	- Present ideas sufficiently with adequate evidence - Demonstrate proper citation
3	- Present ideas briefly with some evidence - Demonstrate inconsistent citation
2	- Present ideas inconsistently with irrelevant evidence - Demonstrate little use of citations
1	- Present little or no evidence - Do not make use of citations

Coherence, Organization, and Style

Score	Criteria
6	- Exhibit skillful organization - Use sophisticated language and structure
5	- Exhibit logical organization - Use fluent and precise language
4	- Exhibit acceptable organization - Use precise and appropriate language
3	- Exhibit some organization - Use primarily basic language
2	- Exhibit inconsistent organization - Lack formal style
1	- Exhibit little organization - Use predominantly incoherent language

Control of Conventions

Score	Criteria
6	- Demonstrate control with essentially no errors
5	- Demonstrate control with occasional errors only
4	- Demonstrate partial control with occasional errors
3	- Demonstrate emerging control with errors
2	- Demonstrate lack of control with frequent errors
1	- Are minimal, making assessment unreliable

How to Use This Rubric

For Teachers: Use to assess students’ argumentative writing skills and their ability to effectively use source materials.
For Students: Use as a guide when writing arguments. Ensure you address all four criteria for comprehensive argumentative writing.
For Test Prep: Understand expectations for each score level to target improvements.

Tips for Success in Regents Argument Writing

Strong Claim: Develop a precise, insightful claim that addresses the task.
Evidence Integration: Support arguments with specific evidence from provided texts.
Clear Organization: Create a cohesive essay with logical progression of ideas.
Sophisticated Style: Use formal language and varied sentence structure.
Source Citation: Properly cite sources to avoid plagiarism.
Counter-Arguments: Address and distinguish from alternate or opposing claims.
Proper Conventions: Maintain control of grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Important Notes

Essays addressing fewer texts than required score no higher than 3
Personal responses with minimal text reference score no higher than 1
Completely copied responses receive a 0
Responses unrelated to task/illegible receive a 0

Regular practice with this rubric will help students develop strong argumentative writing skills for the Regents exam. Remember to address all components and maintain focus on developing a well-supported argument using the provided sources.

Share this post